Censored? Conflicted Concepts of Cultural Heritage (Fifth Annual Conference: 25.-26. November 2021)
In recent years, the terms ‘cancel culture,’ ‘political correctness,’ ‘call-out culture,’ and ‘censorship’ have dominated debates about freedom of speech and scientific research, discussions about memorial sites and the removals of monuments as well as critiques of museum exhibition practices. During the Black Lives Matter movement in the United States, England, and Belgium, protesters were faced with allegations of censorship, moralism, and iconoclasm after monuments to Confederate generals and slave traders became a central focus of the protests. Similar accusations had already begun circulating in 2018, as the #MeToo movement triggered a critical reassessment of artworks on public display, and several exhibitions worldwide were closed, postponed, or had individual exhibits removed.
The concept of censorship can be filled with very different meanings and appropriated by different interest groups. In the narrow sense, it describes only the structural and state-defined form of information control. In contemporary cultural debates, however, censorship is understood much more broadly as a discursive instrument used in different forms of social negotiation (e.g., regulation, moderation, boundary shifting, repression) in dealing with cultural heritage.
Heritage processes are negotiation processes, because the handling and interpretation of a collectively shared heritage is permanently contested. In the process, there are omissions, rewritings, or additions; not only of what constitutes a heritage object but also its social construction. Dissent and conflict are constitutional elements of this negotiation of material and intangible constructions of heritage and identity. By reinvestigating such heritage constructions through the concept of censorship, it offers the possibility to look at what is positively established as heritage or identity. On the other hand, this perspective also directs the focus to what is considered negative, or undesirable, what is suppressed, excluded, rejected or prevented.
The fifth annual conference of the DFG Research Training Group 2227 “Identity and Heritage” aims to contribute to the understanding and historization of censorship debates, the contexts out of which they arose, their dissemination, and the actors involved. Patterns of argumentation and perception associated with the censorship debates are examined from the perspective of the history of discourse, conflict, media and theory.
Conference Location
Bauhaus-University Weimar
Library Building, Steubenstr. 6 (Audimax)
Join our digital conference via Livestream (Zoom)
Program
25. November 2021
10:00
Welcome and Introduction
10:40–12:40
Panel I: Identity and Heritage: Censorship Debates as a Constitutive Element (Moderation: Svenja Hönig, Berlin)
10:40
Arnold Bartetzky (Leipzig)
Zensur von unten? Aktuelle Auseinandersetzungen um unbequeme Denkmäler und umstrittene Kunstwerke
11:20
Rachel Györffy (Budapest)
Zwischen Ikonoklasmus und Nostalgie: Rekonstruktivismus in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Kuratorische Praxis, Cancel Culture oder Musealisierung? Eine Annäherung
12:00
Klara Ullmannova (Prague)
›Post-war‹ Architecture in Czechia as Heritage. Present-day Discourses
12:40–14:20
Lunch break
14:20–16:20
Panel II: Discourse and Differentiation: A Long-Term Perspective on the Concept of Censorship (Moderation: Oliver Trepte, Weimar)
14:20 Lukas Rathjen (Zurich)
Nachkriegsverschiebungen. Humanistische Rhetorik zwischen Erbe und Zensur
15:00 Anatol Rykov (St. Petersburg)
Censorship and Global Art Theory
15:40 Natalie Reinsch (Hannover)
»… der gnädige Schleier des Vergessens …«. Der Zensurstreit zwischen Horst Brandstätter und der Stadt Stuttgart im Jahr 1987 als Aushandlungsprozess um das mit der Person Hanns Martin Schleyer verschränkte Erbe des Linksterrorismus und des Nationalsozialismus
16:20
Conclusion Day 1
26. November 2021
10:00
Come together and Introduction
10:20–12:20
Panel III: Power to Interpret and Dissent: Conflicting Heritage Constructs (Moderation: Zvi Efrat, Tel Aviv)
10:20
Friederike Landau-Donnelly (Nijmegen)
Ghostly Heritage: Exploring Conflictual Sense(s) of Place in Vancouver’s Chinatown
11:00
Anna Angelica Ainio (London)
Leave Them as They Are: The Disfigurement of Robert E. Lee Monument
11:40
Nasima Islam (Calcutta)
Formation of the ›Miya‹: Examining how censored identities are talking back in the Indian state of Assam
12:20–14:00
Lunch break
14:00–16:00
Panel IV: Situation and Preservation: Institutional Practices (Moderation: Darja Jesse, Berlin)
14:00 Patricia Lenz (Zurich)
After »Freedom of Expression?« – Japanese Artists Caught Between Nationalism and Pre-Emptive Obedience
14:40
Irakli Khvadagiani (Tiflis)
Owning the Past – to Control the Present. Post Soviet Know-how in Georgia
15:20–16:00
Coffee break
16:00–17:30
Panel discussion: Censorship and Public Spaces in Times of Monument Removals (Moderation: Jochen Kibel, Berlin)
with Kristina Leko (Berlin), Nnenna Onuoha (Harvard/Potsdam), Niloufar Tajeri (Braunschweig)
17:30 Conclusion Day 2
https://www.identitaet-und-erbe.org/en/veranstaltungen/censored-engl/