Polemika o totalitarnosti socijalističke Jugoslavije
U časopisu “Istorija 20. veka” (br. 1, 2020) povjesničari Josip Mihaljević i Goran Miljan u članku “Was Tito’s Yugoslavia not totalitarian?” polemiziraju s člankom Rudija Klanjšeka i Sergeja Flerea “Was Tito’s Yugoslavia totalitarian?”. U istom broju časopisa o broju srpskih žrtava ustaških zločina polemizira Srdja Trifković.
—
Istorija 20. veka
1/2020
Polemike
Josip Mihaljević, Goran Miljan
WAS TITO’S YUGOSLAVIA NOT TOTALITARIAN? (223–248)
This paper is a response to an article “Was Tito’s Yugoslavia totalitarian?” published in the journal Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (2014). The two authors indicate the inadequate theoretical framework and untenable interpretations made by Flere and Klanjšek, who provided a distorted picture of former Yugoslav society and the position of an individual in it. Their reduced theory of totalitarianism combined with their simplified interpretations served their aim of proving that the system established by the Yugoslav communists was not totalitarian nor did it strive to become one. Flere and Klanjšek’s main argument for the absence of totalitarianism is that of a federal state concept of Yugoslavia, which is not in correlation with contemporary understanding of totalitarianism. By deconstructing their arguments, this article argues for a more elaborated and up-to-date conceptual understanding of Tito’s Yugoslavia and its relation to the concept of totalitarianism.
https://istorija20veka.rs/1-2020/
Tezu slovenačkih raziskovaleca (naučnika) Rudija Klajnšeka i Sergeja Flere da socijalistička Jugoslavija nije bila totalitarna država osporili su dr Josip Mihaljević, istraživač saradnik Instituta za povijest i Goran Miljan, doktorand na Univerzitetu u Upsali. Kolege Mihaljević i Miljan ukazuju da uzimanje federalističkog uređenja kao krunskog dokaza netotalitarnosti režima nije metodološki ispravno i da slovenački istraživači zanemaruju činjenicu da je ključna komponenta jugoslovenske totalitarnosti bila – nametanje jedne ideologije (komunističke) celokupnom društvu i svakom pojedincu.
https://www.facebook.com/pg/istorija20veka/posts/
Srdja Trifković
USTAŠA CRIMES, SERBIAN VICTIMS, NUMBERS AND POLITICS: TOWARD A RATIONAL DEBATE (203–222)
The number of Serbs who were murdered by the Croatian Ustaša regime is still contentious, even though there is broad agreement on the figures among expert historians. The issue is blurred by authors who ignore the canon of scientific discovery. Ustaša terror was awful enough, the author argues. Distorted numbers trivialize debate and degrade the victims.
https://istorija20veka.rs/1-2020/
Problem kvantifikacije broja srpskih žrtava na teritoriji Nezavisne Države Hrvatske izaziva polemike i danas u stručnoj i nestručnoj javnosti. Prilog sveobuhvatnijem sagledavanju ovog fenomena pružio je u svom najnovijem radu dr Srđa Trifković, vanredni profesor na Fakultetu političkih nauka u Banja Luci.
https://www.facebook.com/pg/istorija20veka/posts/