Translated by Gregory Elliott<\/p>\n\n\n\n
How most Western governments and elites have supported the destruction of Gaza and silenced voices calling for the rights of Palestinians<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Providing a record of the first six months of the war waged by the Israeli army after the 7 October attacks and drawing on a rich range of international sources, Didier Fassin examines how most Western governments have acquiesced in and often contributed to the destruction, by the Israeli army, of Gaza, its homes, infrastructures, hospitals, institutions of education, and civilian population. To justify their support and prevent criticism, they have provided an official version of the events, adopting the Israeli narrative. It was largely taken up by mainstream media, which ignored the experiences and perspectives of Palestinians. Dissenting voices were silenced. A policing of language and thought was imposed. Censorship and self-censorship became normalized. To call for a ceasefire or to demand the respect of humanitarian law was enough to prompt the ever-ready accusation of antisemitism. Exploring the multiple dimensions of the extreme inequality of lives between the two sides of the conflict and analyzing the complex geopolitical, economic and ideological stakes that underlie it, Fassin intends to constitute an archive of this moral abdication. In his view, the abandonment of the values and principles proclaimed by Western elites to be foundational will leave a deep scar in the history of the world.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Reviews<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n One of the outcomes of the ongoing genocide in Gaza has been a total collapse of any semblance of moral authority on the part of the West…Didier Fassin\u2019s book surveys this moral abdication, focusing on how many western states and institutions have actively consented to the destruction of Gaza, particularly by obstructing and criminalising Palestinian solidarity. By foregrounding students and other activists who have defended the basic rights of Palestinians, the book also seeks to ‘attest to the existence of a refusal, shared by many, of consent to the obliteration of Gaza’.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Irish Times<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n [A] powerful book…How is it possible, Fassin asks, that with rare exceptions, ‘for political leaders and intellectual personalities of the principal Western countries\u2026the lives of Palestinian civilians are worth several hundred times less than the lives of Israeli civilians’? How do we explain why ‘demonstrations and meetings demanding a just peace are banned’? Why is it that ‘without independent confirmation, most of the mainstream Western media quasi-automatically reproduce the version of events relayed by the camp of the occupiers, while incessantly casting doubt on that recounted by the occupied’? Why do ‘so many of those who could have spoken, not to say stood up in opposition, avert their eyes from the annihilation of a territory, its history, its monuments, its hospitals, its schools, its housing, its infrastructure, its roads, and its inhabitants\u2014in many cases, even encouraging its continuation’?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Omer Bartov, The New York Review of Books<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n 128 pages \/ January 2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n