{"id":2697,"date":"2016-11-23T23:00:05","date_gmt":"2016-11-23T23:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=2697"},"modified":"2016-11-23T23:00:05","modified_gmt":"2016-11-23T23:00:05","slug":"seminar_ideologija-teorije-i-kritike","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=2697","title":{"rendered":"Seminar_Ideologija: teorije i kritike"},"content":{"rendered":"


<\/font><\/p>\n

CENTAR ZA RADNI\u010cKE STUDIJE <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Seminar_Ideologija: teorije i kritike<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Zagreb 26.\/27.11.2016., MAZ, Pavla Hatza 16<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

(scroll down for english)<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Pozivamo vas na redovni godi\u0161nji seminar Centra za radni\u010dke studije u sklopu ovogodi\u0161njeg programa posve\u0107enog teoriji ideologije. U nastavku mo\u017eete pro\u010ditati raspored i sa\u017eetke izlaganja, kao i kratku elaboraciju programa.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Subota, 26.11.2017.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

11 \u2013 12:30h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Ekonomska teorija kao ideologija: J.B. Clarkovo opravdanje nadnica u kapitalizmu<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Toni Prug<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Ekonomija se u po\u010detku etablirala kao politi\u010dka ekonomija, teorijska disciplina koja je uklju\u010divala i odre\u0111ene politi\u010dke dimenzije. Od kasnog devetnaestog stolje\u0107a su prokapitalisti\u010dki orijentirani ekonomisti nastojali razviti ekonomiju kao \u010distu znanost zasnovanu na matemati\u010dkim modelima i oslobo\u0111enu od politi\u010dkog utjecaja. Ve\u0107ina tih autora nikad nije govorila o utjecaju i va\u017enosti politi\u010dkih uvjerenja u njihovom teorijskom radu. Me\u0111u njima se isti\u010de John Bates Clark i to na dva na\u010dina. Prvo, on je svoj rad razumijevao kao izravnu intervenciju u obrani kapitalisti\u010dke proizvodnje od socijalisti\u010dkih ideja, radni\u010dkog pokreta i Marxove teorije. Drugo, vrlo slabo je poznavao i koristio matematiku. Naoru\u017ean sna\u017enim politi\u010dkim stavom i uvjerljivim konceptualnim mi\u0161ljenjem, Clark je doprinio ideji koja se nalazi u samom srcu mejnstrim ekonomije: kapitalisti\u010dka proizvodnja je pravedna i meritokratska, a u njoj su, po prirodnim zakonima, svi faktori proizvodnje pla\u0107eni sukladno njihovom doprinosu.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Toni Prug<\/span><\/b> je doktorirao na Queen Mary, University of London, studiraju\u0107i egalitarnu i participatornu proizvodnju i alokaciju. Istra\u017euje specifi\u010dnosti dru\u0161tvenih formi proizvodnje i njihovog utjecaja na ljudski razvoj.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

15:30 \u2013 17h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Pristanak, prisila, rezignacija: izvori stabilnosti u kapitalizmu<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Vivek Chibber<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Ovo \u0107e izlaganje nastojati pokazati da je obja\u0161njenje dru\u0161tvene stabilnosti u kapitalizmu, razvijeno u suvremenim marksisti\u010dkim teorijama, duboko pogre\u0161no. Pod utjecajem jednako pogre\u0161nog \u010ditanja Antonija Gramscija, marksisti su tvrdili da je esencijalni problem u kapitalizmu stvaranje ideolo\u0161kog pristanka radni\u010dke klase i da taj pristanak osigurava dru\u0161tvenu stabilnost. <\/span>Pokazat \u0107u da se ovaj argument ne mo\u017ee prona\u0107i ni kod Gramscija ni kod Marxa. <\/span>A ako su \u010dak negdje i iznijeli, moramo ga odbiti. Glavni izvor stabilnosti su strukturne prisile nametnute radni\u010dkoj klasi i upravo se te prisile moraju razumjeti i mijenjati. Marksisti se moraju vratiti svojim materijalisti\u010dkim korijenima.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Vivek Chibber<\/span><\/b> je profesor sociologije na Sveu\u010dili\u0161tu New York i autor niza zapa\u017eenih studija me\u0111u kojima se isti\u010de Postcolonial Theory and The Spectre of Capital.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

17:15 \u2013 19h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Op\u0107a diskusija<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Nedjelja, 27.11.2016.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

11 \u2013 12:30h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

\u0160to je va\u017enije u \u017eivotu: ekonomija ili ideologija?<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Marko Kostani\u0107<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Ako je vjerovati dominantnoj medijskoj i analiti\u010dkoj optici, dru\u0161tvo je podijeljeno u dvije rubrike: ekonomiju i ideologiju. Takva podjela \u010dini analitiku prili\u010dno jednostavnom: dru\u0161tveni procesi se razumijevaju s obzirom na udjele ekonomije ili ideologije u njima, bilo da se radi o izborima za predsjednika SAD-a, bilo da se radi o hrvatskom kulturnom polju. Analiti\u010dki napor dose\u017ee do svojevrsne zero-sum game<\/i>: ovdje imamo 60% ideologije, a 40% ekonomije, a negdje drugdje 85% ekonomije, a 15% ideologije. Osim \u0161to do kraja vulgarizira ionako krajnje problemati\u010dnu marksisti\u010dku metaforu baze i nadgradnje, taj pristup je optere\u0107en i dvjema pretpostavkama iz suparni\u010dkog tabora: tradicije neoklasi\u010dne ekonomije. Naime, dru\u0161tveni akteri se individualiziraju i pretpostavlja se njihov (i)racionalni izbor: \u0161to mi je va\u017enije u \u017eivotu \u2013 ekonomija ili ideologija? Druga je pretpostavka isklju\u010denje dimenzije vremena, odnosno povijesti iz cijele pri\u010de, kao da se svi ljudi svako jutro iznova pred ogledalom pitaju \u0161to im je va\u017enije, a nevidljiva ruka agregira sve odluke i transformira ih u dru\u0161tvene u\u010dinke.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Prolaze\u0107i kroz dinamiku i primjere iz hrvatskog politi\u010dkog \u017eivota, nastojat \u0107emo u predavanju predo\u010diti ne\u0161to kompleksniji odnos izme\u0111u ekonomije i ideologije, kao i ukazati na problemati\u010dne aspekte same dihotomije.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

(Predavanje \u0107e se odr\u017eati na hrvatskom jeziku.)<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Marko Kostani\u0107<\/span><\/b> je \u010dlan CRS-a i urednik na regionalnom portalu Bilten.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

15:30 \u2013 17h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Socijalni konstruktivizam i ideologija u dru\u0161tvenim znanostima<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Mislav \u017ditko<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Najkasnije od uspona postmodernizma u sedamdesetim godinama pro\u0161log stolje\u0107a pojam socijalnog konstruktivizma igrao je prominentnu ulogu u dru\u0161tvenim i humanisti\u010dkim znanostima. Na po\u010detku se \u010dinio kao koristan alat za preispitivanje prevladavaju\u0107ih oblika ideolo\u0161ke mistifikacije. Ideologija funkcionira samo zato jer nismo sposobni analizirati njene pozadinske mehanizme, a socijalni konstruktivizam nastoji otkriti skriveni ideolo\u0161ki sadr\u017eaj iza rije\u010di i objekata koje susre\u0107emo u dru\u0161tvenom svijetu. U periodu od nekoliko desetlje\u0107a lista socijalnih konstrukata narasla je iznimno brzo i do drugog predsjedni\u010dkog mandata Billa Clintona uklju\u010divala je, kako napominje Ian Hacking, \u010dinjenice, rod, bolest, autorstvo, emocije, znanje, da ne spominjemo ekonomiju, novac i kvarkove. U ovom izlaganju \u0107emo mapirati upotrebu socijalnog konstruktivizma i prou\u010diti njegov odnos s pojmom ideologije. Na\u0161 je glavni cilj evaluirati posljedice socijalnog konstruktivizma u domeni dru\u0161tvenih znanosti i ispitati, koliko nam je mogu\u0107e, je li pojam ideologije koji slu\u017ei kao glavni pokreta\u010d socijalnog konstruktivizma, uop\u0107e dovoljno prikladan za upotrebu.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Mislav \u017ditko<\/span><\/b> je \u010dlan Centra za radni\u010dke studije i predaje na Filozofskom fakultetu u Zagrebu<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

17:15 \u2013 19h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Op\u0107a diskusija<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

   <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Program Centra za radni\u010dke studije financijski podupire Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Southeast Europe.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

—————————————————– <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

(english)<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Saturday, November 26th<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

11 \u2013 12:30h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Economic theory as ideology: J.B. Clark\u2019s justification of wages in capitalism <\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Toni Prug<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Economics started as political economy, a theoretical discipline that incorporated some political aspects. From the late nineteenth century, pro-capitalist theorists strived to develop economics, a pure science based on mathematical models and an objective approach free form politics. Most of those authors never spoke about the role and importance of their own political beliefs for their work. John Bates Clark stands out in two regards. First, he considered his work to be a direct intervention in defense of capitalist production against socialist ideas, workers\u2019 movements and Marx\u2019s theories. Second, he hardly knew or used any mathematics. Armed with strong political beliefs and persuasive conceptual thinking, directly addressing Marx\u2019s notion of exploitation and its growing popularity, Clark contributed an idea still at the heart of mainstream economics: that capitalist production is just and meritocratic; controlled by a natural law all factors of production are paid according to their contribution.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Toni Prug<\/span><\/b> obtained his PhD from Queen Mary, University of London, studying egalitarian and participatory production and allocation. He is researching specificities of social forms of production and how they shape human development.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

15:30 \u2013 17h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Consent, Coercion and Resignation: The Sources of Stability in Capitalism<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

This talk will suggest that the explanation of social stability in capitalism as developed by recent Marxist theory is deeply flawed. Under the influence of a correspondingly flawed reading of Antonio Gramsci, Marxists have argued that the essential problem in capitalism is the generation of ideological consent on the part of the working class, and it is this consent that provides social stability. I will suggest that this argument cannot be found in either Marx or in Gramsci. And in any case even if they had made such an argument, we ought to reject it. The main source of stability is the structural constraints imposed on the working class, and it is these constraints that need to be understood and changed. Marxists need to return to their materialists roots.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Vivek Chibber <\/span><\/b>teaches sociology at the NYU and is an author of many influential studies, including his latest book Postcolonial Theory and the Spectre of Capital.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

17:15 \u2013 19h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

General discussion<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Sunday, November 27th<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

11 \u2013 12:30h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

What is more important in life: the economy or ideology?<\/span><\/i><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Marko Kostani\u0107<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

If we are to believe the dominant media and analytical optics, society is divided into two distinct rubrics: the economy and ideology. This kind of division makes analytics rather simple: social processes are understood according to the shares of the economy or ideology in them. It makes no difference if we are talking about the US presidential elections or the Croatian cultural field. The peak of analytical effort is some kind of zero-sum game: in this case we have 60% of ideology and 40% of economy and in other one we have 85% of economy and 15% of ideology. Except that this approach vulgarizes the in some regards already quite problematic Marxist metaphor of base and superstructure, it is also pretty much devoted to two presuppositions from the opponent\u2019s camp: neoclassical tradition. Namely, social actors are being individualized and their (i)rational choice is presupposed: what is more important in my life \u2013 the economy or ideology? The second presupposition is concerned with an exclusion of the dimension of time, i.e. history, as if every individual stands every morning in front of the mirror and asks himself what is more important, while the invisible hand aggregates all individual decisions and transforms them into social effects.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

In this lecture we will try, providing some examples from Croatian political life, to outline a more complex relation between the economy and ideology, and also point out some problematic aspects of the dichotomy itself.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Marko Kostani\u0107 <\/span><\/b>is a member of the Centre for Labour Studies and an editor on regional web-portal Bilten.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

15:30 \u2013 17h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Social constructivism and ideology in social science<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Mislav \u017ditko<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

At least since the rise of postmodernism in the late 1970s, the notion of social construction has played a prominent role in the humanities and social sciences. At the beginning it appeared as a useful tool for questioning the prevailing forms of ideological mystification. Ideology works only because one is unable to analyze its underlying mechanisms, and social constructivism aims to disclose the ideological content hidden behind words and objects that one encounters in the social world. In the period of just a few decades the list of social constructs expanded quite rapidly and by the time Bill Clinton got his second term in the Oval office it included, as Ian Hacking pointed out, such things as facts, gender, illness, authorship, emotions and knowledge, not to mention the economy, money, urban schooling and quarks. In this presentation we will map the uses of social constructivism and scrutinize its relationship with the notion of ideology. Our main goal is to evaluate the consequences of social constructivism in the realm of social science and to examine, to the extent that we can, whether the notion of ideology that comes as the prime mover of constructivism, is in fact sensible enough to use.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Mislav \u017ditko <\/span><\/b>is a member of the Centre for Labour studies and a lecturer at Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities in Zagreb.<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

17:15 \u2013 19h<\/span><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

General discussion<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

The program of the Centre for Labour Studies is financially supported by the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Southeast Europe.<\/font><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 ————–<\/font><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

Izvor i dodatne informacije o programu: <\/font><\/span><\/b><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

 <\/font><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n

http:\/\/radnickistudiji.org\/<\/a><\/font><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/span><\/em><\/p>\n


<\/font><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-novosti"],"acf":{"facebook_opis":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":52439,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52439","url_meta":{"origin":2697,"position":0},"title":"Tribina “Ahmi\u0107i 33 godine kasnije: Ne u na\u0161e ime”","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"16. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"U \u010detvrtak, 16. travnja 2026. u 17 sati u Knji\u017enici i \u010ditaonici Bogdana Ogrizovi\u0107a u Zagrebu odr\u017eat \u0107e se tribina pod nazivom Ahmi\u0107i 33 godine kasnije: Ne u na\u0161e ime. Na tribini \u0107e govoriti Ivica \u0110iki\u0107, novinar, Mubera Masli\u0107 \u2013 \u017ddralovi\u0107, aktivistikinja, prevoditeljica za arapski, Domagoj Fuk, student politologije, \u010dlan\u2026","rel":"","context":"U "Novosti"","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Zagreb_2026.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Zagreb_2026.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Zagreb_2026.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Zagreb_2026.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Zagreb_2026.jpeg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52569,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52569","url_meta":{"origin":2697,"position":1},"title":"[Predavanje] Ne \u010dekaju\u0107i inspiraciju \u2013 anga\u017eovane intelektualne, kulturalne i umetni\u010dke prakse u me\u0111uratnom periodu: teorija i praksa kriti\u010dke levice u jugoslovenskoj kulturi (YugoLab)","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"21. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"U vreme agresivnog ja\u010danja globalne desnice, (pro)fa\u0161isti\u010dkih, rasisti\u010dkih i imperijalisti\u010dkih politika, dok je istovremeno globalna levica izrazito slaba, a progresivni pokreti atomizirani i fragmentisani, va\u017eno je iz savremene perspektive vratiti se revolucionarnim i emancipatorskim zbivanjima u jugoslovenskom (ali i s njima u vezi internacionalnim de\u0161avanjima), kao i dru\u0161tvenoj ulozi kulturalnih\u2026","rel":"","context":"U "Novosti"","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":52559,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52559","url_meta":{"origin":2697,"position":2},"title":"Dobitnici dr\u017eavne nagrade za znanost za 2024. godinu","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"20. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Na sjednici Odbora za podjelu dr\u017eavnih nagrada za znanost odr\u017eanoj 16. travnja 2026. godine donesena je Odluka o dodjeli dr\u017eavnih nagrada za znanost za 2024. godinu. Godi\u0161njom nagradom za popularizaciju i promid\u017ebu znanosti nagra\u0111eni su u podru\u010dju humanisti\u010dkih znanosti znanstveni suradnici dr. sc. Josip Mihaljevi\u0107 i dr. sc. Gordan Ravan\u010di\u0107,\u2026","rel":"","context":"U "Novosti"","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52502,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52502","url_meta":{"origin":2697,"position":3},"title":"Novi znanstveni projekt Hrvatskog instituta za povijest: \u201c\u017drtve ratova i dr\u017eavnog\/politi\u010dkog nasilja u hrvatskoj povijesti 20. stolje\u0107a\u201d","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"17. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Na redovitoj sjednici Vlade RH, 16. travnja 2026., donijet je Zaklju\u010dak kojim se pokre\u0107e znanstveni projekt \u201c\u017drtve ratova i dr\u017eavnog\/politi\u010dkog nasilja u hrvatskoj povijesti 20. stolje\u0107a\u201d. Projekt \u0107e provoditi i koordinirati Hrvatski institut za povijest u razdoblju trajanja projekta od pet godina. Zakljucak Vlade RH Iz teksta projektnog prijedloga: Problematika\u2026","rel":"","context":"U "Novosti"","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Vlada-RH.jpg?fit=1200%2C557&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Vlada-RH.jpg?fit=1200%2C557&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Vlada-RH.jpg?fit=1200%2C557&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Vlada-RH.jpg?fit=1200%2C557&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Vlada-RH.jpg?fit=1200%2C557&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52589,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52589","url_meta":{"origin":2697,"position":4},"title":"Predstavljena knjiga Miomira \u017du\u017eula “Dayton: Diplomacija – druga strana rata”","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"22. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Knjiga Miomira \u017du\u017eula \u201eDayton: Diplomacija \u2013 druga strana rata\u201d predstavljena je u srijedu, 22. travnja 2026. godine u foajeu Hrvatskoga narodnog kazali\u0161ta u Zagrebu. Op\u0161irnije: https:\/\/vijesti.hrt.hr\/hrvatska\/predstavljena-knjiga-miomira-zuzula-dayton-diplomacija-druga-strana-rata-12683259 https:\/\/www.vecernji.ba\/amp\/vijesti\/zuzulova-knjiga-o-daytonu-predstavljena-u-zagrebu-diplomacija-kao-druga-strana-rata-1953700 https:\/\/www.tportal.hr\/vijesti\/clanak\/bivsi-sanaderov-ministar-odrzao-promociju-evo-tko-je-sve-dosao-na-predstavljanje-knjige-miomira-zuzula-foto-20260422 https:\/\/direktno.hr\/zivot\/kultura\/zuzul-otkrio-sve-o-drugoj-strani-rata-za-hrvatsku-se-nije-libio-povuci-nekoga-i-za-kosu-395042 https:\/\/www.24sata.hr\/news\/miomir-zuzul-predstavio-je-knjigu-o-daytonu-diplomacija-je-bila-druga-strana-rata-1123152 https:\/\/www.vecernji.hr\/kultura\/kolinda-grabar-kitarovic-otvoreno-miomir-zuzul-nije-vukao-samo-za-rukav-nego-i-za-kosu-1953722 https:\/\/www.vecernji.hr\/kultura\/i-papa-lav-xiv-eksplicitno-je-daytonski-sporazum-istaknuo-kao-primjer-uspjesna-rjesavanja-sukoba-1952215","rel":"","context":"U "Novosti"","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52573,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52573","url_meta":{"origin":2697,"position":5},"title":"Znanstvena konferencija “Filozofija odgoja: povijest, praksa, perspektive”","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"21. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Znanstvena konferencija \"Filozofija odgoja: povijest, praksa, perspektive\" odr\u017eat \u0107e se 23. i 24. travnja 2026. u Konferencijskoj dvorani Knji\u017enice Filozofskog fakulteta u Zagrebu (2. kat).\u00a0Konferencija je organizirana u okviru projekta\u00a0SUMKOS (voditeljica prof. dr. sc. Ivana Zagorac, financiran\u00a0sredstvima NextGenerationEU), uz potporu Odsjeka za filozofiju.\u00a0 Uz izlaga\u010dki dio, konferencija obuhva\u0107a i izlo\u017ebu\u2026","rel":"","context":"U "Novosti"","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2697"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2697\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}