Po\u010detkom godine prenijeli smo obavijesti o apelima intelektualaca, povjesni\u010dara i akademske zajednice povodom zakona o slobodi vjeroispovijesti u Crnoj Gori, a sada prenosimo informacije o tekstovima povjesni\u010dara Stipe Kljai\u0107a \u201cNemirni duhovi Crne Gore\u201d I. i II. dio (koji je nedavno pisao i o knjizi Dragutina Papovi\u0107a \u201cIntelektualci i vlast u Crnoj Gori 1945-1990\u201d) i Fynn-Mortena Heckerta \u201cProtests against the Law on Religious Freedom in Montenegro. A Challenge to the \u201c\u0110ukanovi\u0107-System\u201d?\u201d te komentar Klausa Buchenaua.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
—<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Vijenac<\/em>, 23. travnja 2020.<\/p>\n Ne smiruju se napetosti nakon dono\u0161enja Zakona o slobodi vjeroispovijesti STIPE KLJAI\u0106<\/p>\n Nemirni duhovi Crne Gore<\/strong><\/p>\n Najnovija crnogorska zbivanja posvjedo\u010dila su jo\u0161 jedanput da raspad Jugoslavije nije bio doga\u0111aj jednoga povijesnog trenutka. Nedvojbeno je u pitanju dugotrajni povijesni proces kojem se jo\u0161 ne nazire ni skori kraj ni kona\u010dni ishod<\/p>\n http:\/\/www.matica.hr\/vijenac\/682\/nemirni-duhovi-crne-gore-30275\/<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n Vijenac<\/em>, 7. svibnja 2020.<\/p>\n Nemirni duhovi Crne Gore, II. dio<\/strong><\/p>\n STIPE KLJAI\u0106<\/strong><\/p>\n Potvrda crnogorske neovisnosti ili nova srpska revolucija<\/p>\n Zakon o slobodi vjerskih zajednica poku\u0161aj je da se kona\u010dno zaokru\u017ei crnogorska neovisnost. U protivnom slijedi nova srpska revolucija u Crnoj Gori prema uzoru na onu iz 1918.<\/p>\n http:\/\/www.matica.hr\/vijenac\/683\/potvrda-crnogorske-neovisnosti-ili-nova-srpska-revolucija-30372\/<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u010casopis za suvremenu povijest<\/em>, Vol. 52 No. 1, 2020.<\/p>\n Stipe Kljai\u0107<\/strong><\/p>\n Dragutin Papovi\u0107, Intelektualci i vlast u Crnoj Gori 1945-1990 (Podgorica: Matica crnogorska, 2015), 509 str.<\/p>\n https:\/\/hrcak.srce.hr\/236519<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Contemporary Southeastern Europe <\/em>2020,\u00a07(1),\u00a011-24.<\/p>\n Protests against the Law on Religious Freedom in Montenegro. A Challenge to the \u201c\u0110ukanovi\u0107-System\u201d?<\/strong><\/p>\n By:\u00a0Fynn-Morten Heckert<\/p>\n <\/p>\n On 27 December 2019 the parliament of Montenegro passed a new Law on Religious Freedom. This law replaces an older law regarding the same topic from 1977. There is a broad consensus that the old law is outdated and needs to be revised. However, the new one is (among other aspects) mainly criticized for its articles 62-64, which refer to the ownership of holy assets. It declares that all religious sites and land currently possessed by religious communities and built from common funds of the citizens before 1918 on the territory of present- day Montenegro, shall pass into the ownership of the Montenegrin state, if religious communities cannot give evidence that they were the legal owners of the assets within one year from the promulgation of the Law. This legal norm is highly contested by the oppositional pro-Serbian Democratic Front (DF), the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC), and its supporters, who claim that this law would take away holy places from the SOC and would be discriminatory against the Serbs in Montenegro, which manifests in regular demonstrations, blockades, and even threats of bloodshed in Montenegro if the law is implemented. There was also an incident inside the parliament where MPs of the DF rushed to the parliament speaker and stated that they would be ready to die for their church. After this, police intervened and arrested 18 MPs of the DF. Additionally, the opposition leader Andrija Mandi\u0107 stated that the government would have to \u201ccount on the worst,\u201d if the parliament would adopt that law and that he would \u201cinvite all [his] war friends from 1991 to 1999.\u201d Although after some violent conflicts with injuries on both sides, peaceful walks and protests were announced and organized by the SOC, the situation is tense and reaches international importance as well.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n http:\/\/www.contemporarysee.org\/en\/heckert<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Crna Gora i politi\u010dki koncept autokefalnosti<\/strong><\/p>\n Zakonskim odredbama o crkvenoj imovini u Crnoj Gori vladaju\u0107e strukture poku\u0161avaju oja\u010dati Crnogorsku pravoslavnu crkvu i time identitet crnogorske nacije. Ali uz cijenu produbljivanja podjele dru\u0161tva.<\/p>\n DW, 24.02.2020.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n U sporu o novom zakonu o crkvenim zajednicama u Crnoj Gori u osnovi se stalno mije\u0161aju i isprepli\u0107u dvije razine: s jedne strane pitanje autokefalnosti\u00a0Crnogorske pravoslavne crkve, \u0161to je u osnovi tema koja se prije svega ti\u010de crkvenog prava, a s druge strane politi\u010dka dimenzija koja je prije svega povezana s pitanjem identiteta crnogorske dr\u017eave i nacije.<\/p>\n Kratko nakon \u0161to se 1991. jugoslavenska federacija raspala uzdu\u017e tada\u0161njih republi\u010dkih granica, novo rukovodstvo u Crnoj Gori je “poku\u0161alo svoj legitimitet, te suverenost i stabilnost dr\u017eave oja\u010dati izme\u0111u ostaloga i time da se formira autokefalna crnogorska crkva, na koju bi se onda dr\u017eava mogla oslanjati”, ka\u017ee Klaus Buchenau<\/strong>, povjesni\u010dar sa Sveu\u010dili\u0161ta u Regensburgu i autor vi\u0161e publikacija o religijskim zajednicama na podru\u010dju nekada\u0161nje Jugoslavije. Utoliko se tu radi o “politi\u010dki motiviranom poku\u0161aju uspostavljanja autokefalnosti.”<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\nili uvjerenja i pravnom polo\u017eaju vjerskih zajednica u Crnoj Gori<\/p>\n