{"id":15793,"date":"2019-07-24T21:56:25","date_gmt":"2019-07-24T21:56:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=15793"},"modified":"2019-07-24T21:56:25","modified_gmt":"2019-07-24T21:56:25","slug":"cfp-was-war-die-habsburgermonarchie-16-20-jahrhundert-what-was-the-habsburg-monarchy-16th-20th-centuries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=15793","title":{"rendered":"CfP: Was war die Habsburgermonarchie? 16.\u201320. Jahrhundert \/ What was the Habsburg Monarchy? 16th\u201320th centuries"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Austrijska akademija znanosti poziva na prijavu za znanstveni skup koji \u0107e se odr\u017eati u Be\u010du 8. i 9. listopada 2020. Rok za prijavu: 30. studeni 2019.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>[ENGLISH VERSION BELOW]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Was war die Habsburgermonarchie? Und was tun Historikerinnen und Historiker, wenn sie sich mit deren Geschichte besch\u00e4ftigen? Diese fundamentalen Fragen greift eine Tagung des Instituts f\u00fcr Neuzeit- und Zeitgeschichtsforschung (Forschungsbereich Habsburgermonarchie) der \u00d6AW von 8. bis 9. Oktober 2020 in Wien auf. Beabsichtigt ist, ein Forum zu bieten, in dem neueste Erkenntnisse zum Gesamtgef\u00fcge der Habsburgermonarchie \u00fcber Epochengrenzen und Fachgebiete hinaus in einem gro\u00dfen Kontext diskutiert werden.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Trotz aller in den letzten Jahren vorgelegten innovativen Einzelstudien existiert kein Konsens \u00fcber das staatliche Konzept, das gemeinhin mit dem Begriff \u201eHabsburgermonarchie\u201c bezeichnet wird. Um die verschiedenen Erz\u00e4hlstr\u00e4nge angesichts aktueller geschichtswissenschaftlicher Diskurse \u00fcber politische Gro\u00dfr\u00e4ume im internationalen Umfeld auf den Pr\u00fcfstand zu stellen, liegt eine Bestandsaufnahme und kritisch-reflexive Inventur der Interpretationsweisen, Begriffe und Forschungskonzepte nahe, mit denen an die Geschichte der Habsburgermonarchie als einer vom 16. bis 20. Jahrhundert bestehenden politisch-sozialen Ordnung herangegangen wird.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ob die Habsburgermonarchie in den unterschiedlichen Zeitr\u00e4umen ihrer Existenz als eine dynastische Machtakkumulation des Hauses \u00d6sterreich, eine monarchische Union von St\u00e4ndestaaten, als eine f\u00f6derale Ordnung, eine zusammengesetzte Monarchie (composite monarchy), ein fiscal-military state, eine Gro\u00dfmacht im europ\u00e4ischen M\u00e4chtekonzert, als ein Imperium\/empire, ein Einheitsstaat, eine Doppelmonarchie oder failed state \u2013 um nur einige Interpretationen zu nennen \u2013 eingeordnet wird, f\u00fchrt zu jeweils anderen Fragestellungen und hat eine jeweils unterschiedliche Gewichtung der Faktoren innere Verfasstheit, au\u00dfenpolitische Machtambitionen, Zentrum-Peripherie-Relationen sowie Z\u00e4suren und Kontinuit\u00e4ten zur Folge.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Inwiefern ist es sinnvoll, \u00fcber ein Bestehen der Habsburgermonarchie vor der in den 1520er Jahren begr\u00fcndeten Union der \u00f6sterreichischen, b\u00f6hmischen und ungarischen L\u00e4nder zu sprechen, und welche Folgen f\u00fcr die Interpretation und Fragestellungen ergeben sich daraus?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Welche Bezeichnungen waren f\u00fcr die \u201eHabsburgermonarchie\u201c \u00fcber die Jahrhunderte in Gebrauch? Existieren hier Unterschiede in Eigen- und Fremdbezeichnungen?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Auf welche als besonders charakteristisch wahrgenommenen Aspekte im Gef\u00fcge dieses Staatswesens deuten jene Begrifflichkeiten hin, die seit 1918 und insbesondere in der j\u00fcngeren Vergangenheit in der Geschichtswissenschaft verwendet werden?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Inwiefern stellten sich Dynastie, Hof und weitere Sozialformationen als Garanten der Dauerhaftigkeit der Habsburgermonarchie dar?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Wie sollen charakteristische Merkmale der Habsburgermonarchie \u2013 vor allem die dynastische Einheit der Casa d\u2019Austria, die \u00dcberlappung mit dem politischen System des Heiligen R\u00f6mischen Reiches und des Deutschen Bundes oder der Dualismus seit 1867 \u2013 (vergleichend) eingeordnet und konzeptualisiert werden?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Welche Erinnerungsorte sind bestimmend und identit\u00e4tsbildend f\u00fcr die Wahrnehmung der Monarchie nach innen und von au\u00dfen, zeitgen\u00f6ssisch und in der Nachbetrachtung?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Wie die kurz umrissenen Problemfelder zeigen, stehen Fragen nach der Verfasstheit und den Koh\u00e4sionskr\u00e4ften der Habsburgermonarchie (und ihrer Subsysteme), nach Staatlichkeit, Herrschaft, Repr\u00e4sentation und Partizipation, Wahrnehmung durch die Zeitgenossen sowie letztlich auch nach Identit\u00e4ten im Mittelpunkt der Wiener Tagung.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Abstracts im Umfang von max. 350 W\u00f6rtern k\u00f6nnen in deutscher und englischer Sprache bis sp\u00e4testens 30. November 2019 eingereicht werden. Zus\u00e4tzlich bitten wir um \u00dcbermittlung einer Kurzbiographie.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Bitte richten Sie Ihre Themenvorschl\u00e4ge an:<\/p>\n<p>William D. Godsey\/Barbara Haider-Wilson\/Ulrike Harmat<\/p>\n<p>Institut f\u00fcr Neuzeit- und Zeitgeschichtsforschung<\/p>\n<p>Hollandstra\u00dfe 11\u201313\/1. Stock,<\/p>\n<p>A-1020 Wien<\/p>\n<p>E-Mail: william.godsey@oeaw.ac.at<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>What was the Habsburg Monarchy? How do scholars engage with its history? A conference of the Institute for Modern and Contemporary Historical Research (Research Area Habsburg Monarchy) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences on October 8th\u20139th, 2020 in Vienna will take up these fundamental questions. It will offer a forum for discussing the latest findings on the Habsburg Monarchy in its totality across temporal and disciplinary boundaries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>In spite of the many innovative studies that have appeared in recent years, there is no consensus about the type of political entity associated with the name \u201cHabsburg Monarchy.\u201d In order to test the various narratives in light of the current historical discourse, especially in regard of large sovereign political units embracing many parts, we propose a critical appraisal of the various methods of interpretation, terms, and research concepts that have defined approaches to the Habsburg Monarchy as a political-social order between the 16th and 20th centuries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Historians have applied a wide range of labels to the Habsburg Monarchy in the various stages of its existence: dynastic agglomerate of the House of Austria; monarchical union of Estates-dominated states; composite monarchy; fiscal-military state; great power in the European concert; empire; federal order; unitary state; dual monarchy; failed state, among others. These labels have in turn influenced the types of questions asked and entailed varying emphasis on factors such as domestic structure, foreign policy, center-periphery relations, and the issue of continuities\/discontinuities.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; To what extent does it make sense to speak of the existence of the Habsburg Monarchy before the union of the Austrian, Bohemian, and Hungarian lands in the 1520s? What consequences does an answer to this question have for approaches to and interpretations of its history?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; What contemporary labels were used for the Habsburg Monarchy through the centuries? What were the differences between self-perception and views from the outside?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Which aspects of the body politic have the concepts applied by historians to the Habsburg Monarchy since 1918, particularly in recent decades, highlighted?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; To what extent did the dynasty, court, and other social formations contribute to the stability and durability of the Habsburg Monarchy?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; How might characteristic features of the Habsburg Monarchy including the dynastic unity of the House of Austria, the overlap with the political systems of the Holy Roman Empire and the German Confederation, and the period of Dualism after 1867 be comparatively classified and conceptualized?<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Which places of remembrance were constitutive of self-understanding and perceptions of the Habsburg Monarchy for contemporaries and the generations after 1918, both from without and within?<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As these questions indicate, the problems of the configuration and cohesive forces of the Habsburg Monarchy (and its subsystems), state formation, government, representation and participation, contemporary perceptions and perspectives in the focus of the planned conference.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Abstracts of max. 350 words in either German or English are welcomed until 30th November 2019. Please include a short CV and direct your proposals to:<\/p>\n<p>William D. Godsey \/ Barbara Haider-Wilson \/ Ulrike Harmat<\/p>\n<p>Institute for Modern and Contemporary Historical Research<\/p>\n<p>Hollandstra\u00dfe 11\u201313, 1st floor<\/p>\n<p>A-1020 Vienna<\/p>\n<p>Email: william.godsey@oeaw.ac.at<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.hsozkult.de\/event\/id\/termine-40803\">https:\/\/www.hsozkult.de\/event\/id\/termine-40803<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/habsmon.hypotheses.org\/43\">https:\/\/habsmon.hypotheses.org\/43<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":15794,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[3,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15793","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-novosti","category-skupovi"],"acf":{"facebook_opis":""},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/Habsburgerpfau.jpg?fit=434%2C500&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":52148,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52148","url_meta":{"origin":15793,"position":0},"title":"Poziv za prijavu na me\u0111unarodnu znanstvenu konferenciju \u201eGranice (ne)slobode: Zadarski krug 1966. Intelektualna opozicija u totalitarnom dru\u0161tvu\u201c","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"27. o\u017eujka 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Povodom \u0161ezdesete obljetnice poku\u0161aja osnivanja \u010dasopisa Slobodan glas u Zadru 1966. godine, pozivamo vas na znanstvenu konferenciju posve\u0107enu istra\u017eivanju disidentstva, intelektualne opozicije i granica divergentnog mi\u0161ljenja nasuprot slu\u017ebenoj ideologiji u komunisti\u010dkoj Jugoslaviji. Ideja konferencije je analizirati konkretan fenomen zadarskog slu\u010daja razloge i okolnosti njegove pojave, ali uz otvaranje komparativnih\u2026","rel":"","context":"U &quot;Novosti&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Poziv-konferencija-Zadar.jpg?fit=1200%2C509&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Poziv-konferencija-Zadar.jpg?fit=1200%2C509&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Poziv-konferencija-Zadar.jpg?fit=1200%2C509&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Poziv-konferencija-Zadar.jpg?fit=1200%2C509&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/Poziv-konferencija-Zadar.jpg?fit=1200%2C509&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52559,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52559","url_meta":{"origin":15793,"position":1},"title":"Dobitnici dr\u017eavne nagrade za znanost za 2024. godinu","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"20. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Na sjednici Odbora za podjelu dr\u017eavnih nagrada za znanost odr\u017eanoj 16. travnja 2026. godine donesena je Odluka o dodjeli dr\u017eavnih nagrada za znanost za 2024. godinu. Godi\u0161njom nagradom za popularizaciju i promid\u017ebu znanosti nagra\u0111eni su u podru\u010dju humanisti\u010dkih znanosti znanstveni suradnici dr. sc. Josip Mihaljevi\u0107 i dr. sc. Gordan Ravan\u010di\u0107,\u2026","rel":"","context":"U &quot;Novosti&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/povijesne-kontroverze.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52589,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52589","url_meta":{"origin":15793,"position":2},"title":"Predstavljena knjiga Miomira \u017du\u017eula &#8220;Dayton: Diplomacija &#8211; druga strana rata&#8221;","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"22. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Knjiga Miomira \u017du\u017eula \u201eDayton: Diplomacija \u2013 druga strana rata\u201d predstavljena je u srijedu, 22. travnja 2026. godine u foajeu Hrvatskoga narodnog kazali\u0161ta u Zagrebu. Op\u0161irnije: https:\/\/vijesti.hrt.hr\/hrvatska\/predstavljena-knjiga-miomira-zuzula-dayton-diplomacija-druga-strana-rata-12683259 https:\/\/www.vecernji.ba\/amp\/vijesti\/zuzulova-knjiga-o-daytonu-predstavljena-u-zagrebu-diplomacija-kao-druga-strana-rata-1953700 https:\/\/www.tportal.hr\/vijesti\/clanak\/bivsi-sanaderov-ministar-odrzao-promociju-evo-tko-je-sve-dosao-na-predstavljanje-knjige-miomira-zuzula-foto-20260422 https:\/\/direktno.hr\/zivot\/kultura\/zuzul-otkrio-sve-o-drugoj-strani-rata-za-hrvatsku-se-nije-libio-povuci-nekoga-i-za-kosu-395042 https:\/\/www.24sata.hr\/news\/miomir-zuzul-predstavio-je-knjigu-o-daytonu-diplomacija-je-bila-druga-strana-rata-1123152 https:\/\/www.vecernji.hr\/kultura\/kolinda-grabar-kitarovic-otvoreno-miomir-zuzul-nije-vukao-samo-za-rukav-nego-i-za-kosu-1953722 https:\/\/www.vecernji.hr\/kultura\/i-papa-lav-xiv-eksplicitno-je-daytonski-sporazum-istaknuo-kao-primjer-uspjesna-rjesavanja-sukoba-1952215","rel":"","context":"U &quot;Novosti&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Dayton.jpg?fit=1024%2C683&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52666,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52666","url_meta":{"origin":15793,"position":3},"title":"Najava programa Festivala povijesti Kliofest (5-8. V. 2026)","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"24. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"Po trinaesti put odr\u017eava se Festival povijesti Kliofest! Do petka \u0107emo odr\u017eati osam okruglih stolova i dva kolokvija te niz predstavljanja knjiga i projekata razli\u010dite tematike, od antike do suvremenosti. Bit \u0107e predstavljeno i nekoliko izlo\u017ebi te odr\u017ean jedan povijesni kviz. Prikazat \u0107emo i jedan film \u2013 o generalu Boroevi\u0107u.\u2026","rel":"","context":"U &quot;Novosti&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Kliofest-2026.jpg?fit=526%2C526&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Kliofest-2026.jpg?fit=526%2C526&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/Kliofest-2026.jpg?fit=526%2C526&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":52508,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52508","url_meta":{"origin":15793,"position":4},"title":"Glazbena radionica \u201eDUGMETARA REVISITED\u201c","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"17. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"DUGMETARA REVISITED glazbena radionica vodi: Ana Horvat 13., 20. i 27. travnja, od 18 do 20 sati Radiona, Nova cesta 186 Na tri radioni\u010dka susreta uranjamo u naslje\u0111e Dugmetare, biv\u0161e tvornice dugmadi na Savskoj cesti koja je po\u010detkom 2000-ih igrom slu\u010daja postala \u017eivo, jedinstveno mjesto glazbene proizvodnje. Svoje su probe\u2026","rel":"","context":"U &quot;Novosti&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/TRESNJA_TRESTI.jpg?fit=380%2C475&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":52657,"url":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?p=52657","url_meta":{"origin":15793,"position":5},"title":"[Predavanje] Jezik i drugost u (post)socijalisti\u010dkoj Srbiji: diskurzivne politike identiteta (YugoLab)","author":"Branimir Jankovi\u0107","date":"24. travnja 2026.","format":false,"excerpt":"U sklopu projekta Prizma \/ IMAGINATION (\u201eZami\u0161ljanje nacije: srpski nacionalni narativi u sporu (XX\u2013XXI vek)\u201c), koji se realizuje na Institutu za filozofiju i dru\u0161tvenu teoriju Univerziteta u Beogradu (2024\u20132027) uz finansijsku podr\u0161ku Fonda za nauku Republike Srbije, organizuje se serija predavanja na kojoj istra\u017eiva\u010di i istra\u017eiva\u010dice projekta predstavljaju rezultate svojih\u2026","rel":"","context":"U &quot;Novosti&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Novosti","link":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/?cat=3"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IFDT_28_IV.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IFDT_28_IV.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IFDT_28_IV.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IFDT_28_IV.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/historiografija.hr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/IFDT_28_IV.png?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1&resize=1050%2C600 3x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15793","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=15793"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15793\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15795,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15793\/revisions\/15795"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/15794"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=15793"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=15793"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/historiografija.hr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=15793"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}